An Activity Based Method for Sustainable Manufacturing Modeling and Assessment in SYSML

  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /var/www/vhosts/ on line 906.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter::options_validate() should be compatible with views_handler::options_validate($form, &$form_state) in /var/www/vhosts/ on line 0.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter::options_submit() should be compatible with views_handler::options_submit($form, &$form_state) in /var/www/vhosts/ on line 0.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_style_default::options() should be compatible with views_object::options() in /var/www/vhosts/ on line 0.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_row::options_validate() should be compatible with views_plugin::options_validate(&$form, &$form_state) in /var/www/vhosts/ on line 0.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_row::options_submit() should be compatible with views_plugin::options_submit(&$form, &$form_state) in /var/www/vhosts/ on line 0.
Author Name: 
Yuriy Romaniw
Publication Title: 
MS Thesis, Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology

Traditionally, environmental impacts of man made products have been
determined by performing a life cycle assessment (LCA) on the product. As the name
implies, LCA is usually covers the entire life of the product in a so-called “cradle-tograve”
assessment. In determining environmental impacts over the whole product life,
LCA’s are reasonably adequate. However, in providing detailed impacts on a particular
phase of life, LCA’s are lacking. Detailed assessments are important because very few
stakeholders have influence over a product during all phases of life. Stakeholders need
detailed impact assessments in their particular phase of life. More detailed assessments
give stakeholders more information that can be used for better environmental
management (EM) and more environmentally benign operations. In many LCA’s, the
manufacturing phase of life has been over-generalized and over-simplified because of its
relatively small environmental impact, as compared to other phases of life. Nevertheless,
certain stakeholders, such as manufacturing companies, need detailed impact information
for the manufacturing phase of life so that they can create a more sustainable
manufacturing process. Most traditional LCA’s use a case-based approach, which was
deemed to be inadequate. For these LCA’s, the information provided for each case is
often quite detailed and specific. However, this makes the assessment less flexible,
limiting the quality of the assessment to the degree that the current scenario matches the
existing cases. In order to make a more user-specific assessment, a model-based approach
was used. To give the model flexibility, a parametric model was created based on
mathematical equations that represent various parts of the manufacturing process. To give
the model structure, an activity-based costing (ABC) approach was used. Using the ABC
structure, the manufacturing process was broken down into activities, each of which was
characterized by mathematical models. Large models would be difficult to construct and
simulate by hand, so a model was built with the aid of a computer. The modeling
language SysML (Systems Modeling Language) was used to create an object-oriented
model of the manufacturing process, using the ABC structure. SysML defines overall
properties and behaviors of the various elements in the model, while the plug-in tool
ParaMagic was used to execute the model via a Mathematica Solver. The model
computes carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, and waste mass generation for
a particular manufacturing scenario. The goal of the model was to quantify environmental
impact factors in order to aid manufacturing stakeholders in EM. The overall goal of the
research was to determine whether an activity-based, object-oriented model was a valid
approach, and whether the computer-aided tools adequately implemented this approach.
Findings show that SysML is capable of modeling large and complex systems. However,
due to some limitations of ParaMagic, only some of SysML’s capabilities were utilized.
Nevertheless, ParaMagic is capable of extracting information out of a manufacturing
model built in SysML, and solving parametric relations in Mathematica in a timely
manner. Timely solutions of complex models are critical for stakeholders keeping a
competitive edge.